-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Validate that pubrules passes on PRs. #29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
b559fc9 to
954652b
Compare
|
@jyasskin can you try again? w3c/spec-prod#207 has some fixes that I found working fine locally. |
Also adjust editorconfig to indent workflows correctly.
954652b to
b876f1d
Compare
|
I saw something else broke with setup-node part. Will address. |
|
@sidvishnoi Something's wrong now with how the action installs itself: |
|
@jyasskin Requesting a last attempt from you, before I setup and test myself in a fork. 🙏 nvm. I'm testing on my fork now. |
|
@jyasskin it works now. I'll release new version of the spec-prod action tomorrow or on Monday. |
|
Thanks @sidvishnoi! |
SHA: 3fd038c Reason: push, by jyasskin Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts most of commit 3fd038c but leaves the incidental .editorconfig change. The fix in spec-prod was effectively reverted due to w3c/spec-prod#213.
SHA: d5e6416 Reason: push, by jyasskin Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Also adjust editorconfig to indent workflows correctly.
This is blocked on w3c/spec-prod#207.